RSS Feed
  1. Tattoo Barbie outrage, again

    October 28, 2011 by sylvia

    Following on from yesterday’s post, ‘ Of Mere Plastic‘, here’s another Barbie discussion.

    Make sure you click the title of this post to comment or ‘like’!

     

     

     

    The latest collector’s Barbie has been released – the Tokidoki Barbie is sold out til November, priced at $50 and aimed primarily at collectors (notice her eyes, harking back to the original doll?).

    Tokidoki Barbie has sparked outrage because she has pink hair and tattoos.. accused of being a poor rolemodel for young girls. This whole debate has been interesting to watch, moreso than usual ‘will somebody think of the children’ debates, because there are so many sides to it.

    Personally, I think the doll is harmless, it’s clearly aimed at collectors and diehard Barbie fans, and to be honest if I had a daughter, I would think twice about giving her a $50 doll to play with, never mind what it’s wearing.

    The main problem that some people seem to have with her is the fact that she has tattoos and pink hair – which are clearly ‘adult’ expressions of individuality. Fine, that’s fair enough – I can understand that we shouldn’t be glamourising tattoos to children, a tattoo is a permanent body modification that affects how people judge and treat you. This is what I tell my high school students who are nearing the age of 18 and contemplating spending their considerable disposable income on a tattoo or piercing. As far as I’m aware, none of those high schoolers play with Barbies. What 5 year old is going to actually be considerably affected by an admiration of tattoos? When I was 5 I wanted to be a cat. I had neither the funds nor the attention span to consider taking any real action to pursue this dream. As I write this now, I am not a cat, nor have I had any had any cosmetic surgery to look more like a cat, nor do I participate in any extra-curricular activities that require me to dress as a cat. I doubt any 5 year old will take any action on their dream to have a pretty tattoo. (However, this isn’t the first time Barbie has faced criticism over body modification – there have been 2 previous tattoo Barbie models, both attracting the wrath of parents the world over).

    One highly-publicised comment on the tattoo issue has been: ‘Encouraging children that tattoos are cool is wrong, wrong, wrong. Mattel why not put a cigarette and a beer bottle in her hand while you’re at it!’

    Well.. tattoos don’t give you lung or liver cancer …

     

    The point has been made that it’s Barbie’s incredible body proportions that are truly damaging to little girls, and this point has been addressed in the previous essay, Of Mere Plastic. It’s interesting that we are now so desensitised to her body shape that commenters have generally failed to mention it, instead drawing fantastic generalisations and poorly-informed conclusions about alcoholism and cigarettes. (Coincidentally, not many comments about the fact that her little dog is called Bastardino)…

     

    Let’s set aside for a moment the fact that this is clearly a limited-edition collectors’ doll meant for Barbie and Tokidoki enthusiasts and imagine that this really is going to be playe with by children everywhere. What will they learn about having coloured hair and tattoos? Mattel’s insistance that “the doll gives girls a chance to express themselves and be creative” makes me vomit a little in my mouth.. instead I think it acts merely as an awareness-raiser. If you’ve ever seen a child stare at a brightly-coloured tattooed individual at a shopping centre, you’ll assume that they don’t often see people who dress or look so differently. Is this not just broadening Barbie’s universe further to include some different (albeit painfully fashionable) styles? Does the rabid fear of this doll reflect a fear of her real-world counterparts? A fear that someone’s child may grow up and choose to follow this trend?

     

    Finally, what about tattooed parents? The point was made by a (pink-haired and tattooed) friend of mine that one day her children may wonder why there are no dolls that look like Mummy… Perhaps, despite its adult audience, this doll may be a step to more a more inclusive range of toys for children? A tiny step. A baby step. More of a lean.

    OK, not really.

     

    Read more:


    Daily Mail

    Jezabel


  2. Of Mere Plastic

    October 27, 2011 by sylvia

    ..The doll is propelled through outer space,

    A kind of miniature Barbarella.

    She sports “Miss Astronaut” (1965),

    A metallic silver fabric suit

    (The brown plastic straps at the shoulders

    And across the bodice feature

    Golden buckles) and two-part

    White plastic helmet. Her accessories:

    Brown plastic mittens,

    Zip boots, and sheer nylon

    Mattel flag, which she triumphantly sticks

    Into another conquered planet.

    - David Trinidad, from Of Mere Plastic

     

     

     

    Around the world, two Barbie dolls are sold every second[1], and in 1992 it was determined that if all the Barbie dolls ever sold “were placed head to toe, they would describe the circumference of the earth four times”[2]. Barbie is “America’s most beloved, most notorious piece of posable plastic”[3] – born in 1956 when Mattel founder Ruth Handler found a risqué doll called Bild Lilli during a trip to Europe. The Lilli doll was a novelty item from a popular adult cartoon strip, designed for men – but she inspired Handler to develop an adult doll for young girls, with the intention of allowing them to project their fantasies of the future onto her[4]. Barbie first experienced controversy – criticised for being too overtly sexual, with her imposing measurements (40-18-32 if she were a real woman[5]), but quickly won over many fans and now has 100 per cent name recognition with mothers of girls between the ages of three and ten[6]. While Barbie is surrounded by huge controversy about her sexuality, whiteness, agelessness and narrow depiction of femininity, it is her plasticity (both physically and ideologically) that becomes apparent when considered in relation to Barthes’ ideas regarding plastic.

     

    Barbie can be argued to be reflective of both the transitory nature of plastic, and of the later criticism of its stiff, fake and common nature. Importantly, she was originally intended to be something of a blank canvas – says Handler: “I designed Barbie with a blank face, so that the child could project her own dreams of the future onto Barbie. I never wanted to play up the glamorous life of Barbie. I wanted the owner to create a personality for the doll”[7] – this same argument has been used to dismiss claims that Barbie’s sexuality influences the children who play with her: “Is there such widespread contempt for the intelligence of children that we really imagine they are stupid enough to be shaped by a doll?”[8] – the doll doesn’t make the idea[9], and instead gives the user (and their imagination) the power – “excuse the pun, but she becomes plastic in children’s hands”[10]. Barbie is also credited with the power to shift classes[11], not only switching from town house to camper van to office to spa, but also by forming a link between the demographics of children who play with her. Perhaps one of her most commented on ephemeral aspects is her costume – sometimes remarked upon with horror (Quindlen likens her to Dracula, constantly masking her true nature[12]), but often suggested as being evidence of her power to transcend sexual and cultural boundaries, by opening herself up to any occupation, future or personality. Is Barbie’s fluid state evidence of her inherent ideological plasticity? Perhaps if she is shaped by children’s imagination, she is in a constant state of transformation, just as plastic is identified to be by Barthes – Jong believes that “whether you give children cornhusks or nutcrackers or Barbies to play with, the subversive imagination of childhood will triumph. A toy is a repository of fantasy”[13].

     

    What then of the other aspects of plasticity mentioned by Barthes? The ones he so vehemently criticises – its commonality, cheapness, fakeness? These too are present in Barbie and her empire. Physically, Barbie has been changed over the years to include a twistable waist and bendable knees, but many still express dissatisfaction with the “inherently displeasing limitations of Barbie’s anatomy”[14], and describe many often ill-fated attempts to make her sit properly, ride horses, or walk bare-foot. Attempts in 1975 to create a Skipper (Barbie’s younger sister) doll that hit puberty and “grew up” (making her transcend the plastic tomb of age in which she is trapped) are criticised for being lame and ignorant attempts to transform her into two dolls – a child and a teen. When her left arm was cranked backwards, small breasts “emerged from her formerly flat chest”[15] – her function to constantly go backwards and forwards between the two stages in life, never really achieving any meaningful transformation, and never really growing up (Paris points out that this limited view of a girl’s puberty involved only breasts, not blood[16]). Celebrity versions of Barbie have been made – when Diahann Carroll, of TV series Julia saw the doll for which she modelled she brusquely stated: “It looks like all the other Barbies”[17]. She is unable to look different, any more real. This can be considered a symptom of her material – Barthes claimed, plastic is unable to attain the perfection of nature, (although ironically Ruth Handler went on to create Nearly Me, a plastic breast prosthesis with a natural look and feel[18]). Barbie has been developed to increase diversity amongst the range – she has had many careers, and has been released with different skin tones and hair and eye colours – and yet her representation of the white middle-class American ideal remains the same[19].

     

    Both Barbie and plastic have been criticised for much in their time, and often these criticisms are linked. While Barbie has been celebrated for mirroring plastic’s fluidity – physically, socially, philosophically – she has been similarly criticised for being “plastic in the worst sense: hard, fake, a mass-market commodity”[20], forever trapped in her plastic state – both ultra-feminine, and robbed of her femininity, sexual, and without sex, she embodies the optimism and economic growth of the post-World War II America in which she was created[21], and the social and physical ideals of her consumer society. Do her many costumes and occupations function as freedom from any one path, or as disguises and masks to cover her true nature, her true existence – the negative existence of plastic that leads Barthes to turn so viciously against the material which was once an expression of power and freedom? Barbie is a doll “famous for her capacity to constantly change, as well as her paradoxically concomitant capacity to always remain the same”[22] – she embodies the positive and the negative characteristics of plastic, be they physical or ideological, for better or for worse.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Sources Used

    Barthes, R., “Plastic” in Mythologies, trans. Annette Lavers, Phaidon Press, London, 1973

    McDonough, Y., ed. The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, Touchstone, New York, 1999

    The History of Plastic, American Chemistry Council, Inc., Virginia, Available on-line at: http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_plastics/doc.asp?CID=1102&DID=4665#alexander, 2005-2010

     


    [1] Anna Quindlen, “Barbie at 35”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, Touchstone, New York, 1999, p119

    [2] Carol Ockman, “Barbie meets Bouguereau: Constructing an Ideal Body for the Late Twentieth Century”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p85

    [3] Yona Zeldis McDonough, The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, p15

    [4] Steven Dubin, “Who’s that Girl? The World of Barbie Deconstructed”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p20

    [5] Ibid, p24

    [6] Carol Ockman, “Barbie meets Bouguereau: Constructing an Ideal Body for the Late Twentieth Century”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p85

    [7] Ibid, p81

    [8] Yona Zeldis McDonough, “Sex and the Single Doll”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, p112

    [9] Steven Dubin, “Who’s that Girl? The World of Barbie Deconstructed” from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p29

    [10] Ibid, p28

    [11] Carol Ockman, “Barbie meets Bouguereau: Constructing an Ideal Body for the Late Twentieth Century”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p83

    [12] Anna Quindlen, “Barbie at 35” from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p117

    [13] Erica Jong, “Twelve Dancing Barbies”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p202

    [14] Leslie Paris, “Teen Idol: Growing up with Growing-Up Skipper”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p70

    [15] Ibid, p65

    [16] Ibid, p67

    [17] Carol Ockman, “Barbie meets Bouguereau: Constructing an Ideal Body for the Late Twentieth Century”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p83-84

    [18] Steven Dubin, “Who’s that Girl? The World of Barbie Deconstructed”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p22

    [19] Carol Ockman, “Barbie meets Bouguereau: Constructing an Ideal Body for the Late Twentieth Century”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p86

    [20] Leslie Paris, “Teen Idol: Growing up with Growing-Up Skipper”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p69

    [21] Steven Dubin, “Who’s that Girl? The World of Barbie Deconstructed”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p22

    [22] Carol Ockman, “Barbie meets Bouguereau: Constructing an Ideal Body for the Late Twentieth Century”, from The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns 40, ed. McDonough, p82


  3. Language in Australian Indigenous Education

    August 11, 2011 by sylvia

     

    Education is not whitefella. It belongs to the world.”

    – David Price

     

    The issue of language in the education of Indigenous students is one with broad and far-reaching consequences, affecting a great proportion of students and families, and contributing to the yawning gaps in educational standards between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. Aboriginal educational issues are not often simple and isolated, but rather are complicated and interconnected, with issues such as language being linked to socio-economic, health, social and communication issues. These interconnected issues have a major impact on students’ attitudes to schooling, bullying, ‘drop-out’ rates, and literacy and numeracy skills. This essay will explore the issue of language in Aboriginal education, in particular where language and communication is affected by health and culture and how this impacts on the education of Indigenous students, as well as strategies to improve language related issues that may already be in place, and those which can be used in one’s own classroom.

     

    The issue of language in terms of Indigenous education is a complex and multi-faceted one, and defining it requires an understanding of the vast range of influencing issues, as well as an understanding of the many issues which are influenced in turn by it; language is only a small part of a larger whole in terms of Indigenous education. One of the aspects of the issue of language discussed in this essay is the teaching of Standard Australian English and the discussions around bilingual education in remote communities. While the National statement of principles and standards for more culturally inclusive schooling in the 21st Century states that “schooling acknowledges the capacity of all young Indigenous people to learn by… expecting all Indigenous children to be fluent in Standard Australian English and at the same time being inclusive of the student’s home language” (MCEECDYA, 2000), the issue of language and its use in the education of Indigenous children is still debated. Language is an issue inextricably linked with communication, especially verbal, and as such is also influenced heavily by culture and health. This essay will analyse the health issues that often cause problems with language and communication that significantly affect the educational experience and outcomes for Indigenous students, as well as the cultural circumstances around the debate about bilingual education.

     

    Speaking of mainstream education, Susan Butler, editor of the Macquarie Dictionary states that the use of Standard Australian English “comes back to the long-established and very worthy desire that teachers have to protect their students against solecism so that they pass the exam they want to pass, they get the job they want to have, they achieve the lifetime of honour and distinction which they want to achieve” (Australian Style, 2010). While these goals are universal, they are not reached by all students; with only 36% of Indigenous young people continuing their education to year 12, and less than 2% going on to undertake tertiary studies, far below the average for non-Indigenous students (Ashman & Elkins, 2009). The Cape York Institute’s discussion paper on Literacy Improvement (2007) states that “early access to a Standard Australian English environment will help to prepare Indigenous children to develop their literacy skills” – but in many communities (especially those in rural or remote areas), Indigenous children may not receive these kinds of foundations, arriving at school already disadvantaged in terms of literacy and language. Warlpiri woman Bess Nungarrayi Price, mother and advocate of Indigenous issues voices the views of many Indigenous parents when she discussing whether teaching predominately in English is more or less beneficial than teaching in local languages with English as a second language: “Why wouldn’t I want my children, my families, to be taught English first, because that’s a way in to the future… in order to get to know about the whole world you need that understanding of English to get you there, and that’s not happening with our children… The Northern Territory Government has made it their policy to teach English for four hours.. and I supported that and I agreed that that’s how schools should deliver English. You find that people around my age we all had that same kind of education and it was taught properly and that’s not what’s happening now and that’s why education is failing for our children. We want teachers to come out to our communities and teach English and not worry about trying to be blackfellas, not try to pretend to be someone that they aren’t, and that’s what’s happening, and to teach our children as if they are teaching white students.”(ABC Radio National, 2011) Her husband David Price, who has taught in both bilingual and English programmes, states that he has “never seen a bilingual programme done properly” either because teachers are poorly trained, because of the large number of languages still existing (“17”), or because no written resources in those languages exist, and suggests that if bilingual programmes are not totally successful, they should not be attempted at all.

     

    Ashman and Elkins cite another cause of low literacy achievement as being “a middle-ear infection such as otitis media or glue ear” (Ashman & Elkins, 2009, p114). Estimates of the prevalence of ear diseases amongst Indigenous children vary, Armstrong, Laing and Wilkes suggest the figure is 50% in some communities (Armstrong, Laing, Wilkes, 2008), while Reid and Trompf suggest the figure to be as high as 80% (much higher than for non-Indigenous children), often resulting in hearing loss “significant enough to interfere with education, particularly in the delayed acquisition of language skills”(Reid & Trompf, 1991, p58). Middle ear perforation and discharge can occur very early in life (generally in the first year of life) and once older, discharge becomes chronic although intermittent. While perforations do heal, the hearing loss caused by them (and chronic ear discharge) occurs at a “critical time for learning and the development of language skills” (Reid & Trompf, 1991, p329). Unfortunately, there is little evidence that any medical treatment can alter the outcome of chronic ear discharge, and so the priority must now be to not only reduce the prevalence of the condition, but to put measures in place to help children suffering from these diseases as well as their families, to aid not only their language development at home, but their transition into a school environment, and to avoid issues such as bullying, literacy and attitudes towards schooling.

     

    With the growing awareness of literacy and language development issues among Indigenous children, there are a growing number of prevention strategies appearing. Some, like the bilingual education David Price referred to as unreliable, are hotly debated by teachers, and others are already in place in many schools. Reid & Trompf mention the development of improved hearing aid devices for use in schools, and improved teaching for teachers on the education of hearing impaired Indigenous children (1991, p329), and Burrow and Galloway give a detailed list of strategies to work with Indigenous children with hearing impairment, including the development and improvement of literacy and language skills. They give suggestions for classroom management such as seating arrangement, organisation of classrooms to minimise noise, installation of amplification devices, the negotiation with students of set “listening behaviours”, pre-teaching new material (key words etc), the establishment of predictable routines and of peer support or “buddy” systems. They also suggest that teachers take the time to identify the gaps in a child’s language development and help the student develop the understanding of language that is critical to success in written literacy, focusing on phonological awareness, text skills, linking sounds and written language and developing “world” knowledge (of concepts, context and content of language) (Burrow Galloway, Weisnoffer, 2009). Comics such as Streetwize’s 2006 “Cooee! Can ya hear me?” and factsheets such as the 2008 “Hearing in the classroom” produced by Australian Hearing also provide both teachers and students with strategies to maximise learning in the classroom and generate discussion about students’ needs and how these are met. The Cape York Institute suggests a number of strategies to improve language ant literacy skills in Indigenous schools including the linking of welfare payments to school attendance, improving the quality of teaching in remote communities (it’s estimated a third of teachers in Cape York have no previous experience – and even those with experience can be improved with professional development strategies such as the What Works. The Works Program [www.whatworks.edu.au]), and the improvement of literacy outcomes, advocating the use of Macquarie University’s remedial literacy program MULTILIT (Making Up Lost Time in Literacy), as well as early childhood interventions and ongoing interventions at a community and school level. Other programs and resources such as the National Accelerated Literacy Program (2007, formerly Scaffolding Literacy), Aboriginal voices: Activities and resources for English (produced by the Department of Education, Training and Employment, 2000) and Building bridges: Literacy development in young Indigenous Children ( produced by Fleer and Williams-Kennedy, 2002) have been produced to help teachers, students and families understand and work to solve literacy, language and communication issues in Indigenous education. MULTILIT, for example, has been accepted by the Cape York Institute as well as the Australian Government, which agreed to fund its introduction in the four schools located in the Welfare Reform trial communities, beginning in 2008, and has achieved much success with its students and is used internationally for students in special education, mainstream education and Indigenous education as well as at a community level.

     

    While these are all steps in the right direction, it is important to remember that there are many more Indigenous who are not given access to this kind of program and still struggle linguistically every day, whether through lack of exposure to Standard Australian English, starting and falling behind at school, because of an ear disease or hearing difficulties stunting language development, or simply through lack of attendance, and it is these students that we as educators, parents or policy makers need to reach in order to make a true difference to the wide gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. It is important that while considering the complicated and inter-connected issues of Indigenous education, that we remember that “while Indigenous students may present as a homogenous group they represent a wide variety of languages, beliefs and practices” (Dempsey & Arthur-Kelly, 2007). As earlier noted by Burrow and Galloway, teachers need to take the time to identify gaps in their students’ development and subsequently identify the right course of action for that individual. Perhaps a structured program such as MULTILIT is necessary, or perhaps it is a cooperative relationship and communication with a student’s parents (who must always be recognised as the first educators of a child). Whatever the solution may be, it must be recognised to exist. There are many resources available to teachers, school staff, parents, and students themselves, that if taken advantage of, could truly change the educational path of an Aboriginal child forever. Perhaps David Price puts it most succinctly when he says that “we want Aboriginal children to talk to the world, not just to whitefellas”.

     

     

     

    Coooee! Can ya hear me?, (2006), Sydney, Streetwize Communications,

     

     

     

    Education is not whitefella. It belongs to the world.”

    – David Price

     

    The issue of language in the education of Indigenous students is one with broad and far-reaching consequences, affecting a great proportion of students and families, and contributing to the yawning gaps in educational standards between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. Aboriginal educational issues are not often simple and isolated, but rather are complicated and interconnected, with issues such as language being linked to socio-economic, health, social and communication issues. These interconnected issues have a major impact on students’ attitudes to schooling, bullying, ‘drop-out’ rates, and literacy and numeracy skills. This essay will explore the issue of language in Aboriginal education, in particular where language and communication is affected by health and culture and how this impacts on the education of Indigenous students, as well as strategies to improve language related issues that may already be in place, and those which can be used in one’s own classroom.

     

    The issue of language in terms of Indigenous education is a complex and multi-faceted one, and defining it requires an understanding of the vast range of influencing issues, as well as an understanding of the many issues which are influenced in turn by it; language is only a small part of a larger whole in terms of Indigenous education. One of the aspects of the issue of language discussed in this essay is the teaching of Standard Australian English and the discussions around bilingual education in remote communities. While the National statement of principles and standards for more culturally inclusive schooling in the 21st Century states that “schooling acknowledges the capacity of all young Indigenous people to learn by… expecting all Indigenous children to be fluent in Standard Australian English and at the same time being inclusive of the student’s home language” (MCEECDYA, 2000), the issue of language and its use in the education of Indigenous children is still debated. Language is an issue inextricably linked with communication, especially verbal, and as such is also influenced heavily by culture and health. This essay will analyse the health issues that often cause problems with language and communication that significantly affect the educational experience and outcomes for Indigenous students, as well as the cultural circumstances around the debate about bilingual education.

     

    Speaking of mainstream education, Susan Butler, editor of the Macquarie Dictionary states that the use of Standard Australian English “comes back to the long-established and very worthy desire that teachers have to protect their students against solecism so that they pass the exam they want to pass, they get the job they want to have, they achieve the lifetime of honour and distinction which they want to achieve” (Australian Style, 2010). While these goals are universal, they are not reached by all students; with only 36% of Indigenous young people continuing their education to year 12, and less than 2% going on to undertake tertiary studies, far below the average for non-Indigenous students (Ashman & Elkins, 2009). The Cape York Institute’s discussion paper on Literacy Improvement (2007) states that “early access to a Standard Australian English environment will help to prepare Indigenous children to develop their literacy skills” – but in many communities (especially those in rural or remote areas), Indigenous children may not receive these kinds of foundations, arriving at school already disadvantaged in terms of literacy and language. Warlpiri woman Bess Nungarrayi Price, mother and advocate of Indigenous issues voices the views of many Indigenous parents when she discussing whether teaching predominately in English is more or less beneficial than teaching in local languages with English as a second language: “Why wouldn’t I want my children, my families, to be taught English first, because that’s a way in to the future… in order to get to know about the whole world you need that understanding of English to get you there, and that’s not happening with our children… The Northern Territory Government has made it their policy to teach English for four hours.. and I supported that and I agreed that that’s how schools should deliver English. You find that people around my age we all had that same kind of education and it was taught properly and that’s not what’s happening now and that’s why education is failing for our children. We want teachers to come out to our communities and teach English and not worry about trying to be blackfellas, not try to pretend to be someone that they aren’t, and that’s what’s happening, and to teach our children as if they are teaching white students.”(ABC Radio National, 2011) Her husband David Price, who has taught in both bilingual and English programmes, states that he has “never seen a bilingual programme done properly” either because teachers are poorly trained, because of the large number of languages still existing (“17”), or because no written resources in those languages exist, and suggests that if bilingual programmes are not totally successful, they should not be attempted at all.

     

    Ashman and Elkins cite another cause of low literacy achievement as being “a middle-ear infection such as otitis media or glue ear” (Ashman & Elkins, 2009, p114). Estimates of the prevalence of ear diseases amongst Indigenous children vary, Armstrong, Laing and Wilkes suggest the figure is 50% in some communities (Armstrong, Laing, Wilkes, 2008), while Reid and Trompf suggest the figure to be as high as 80% (much higher than for non-Indigenous children), often resulting in hearing loss “significant enough to interfere with education, particularly in the delayed acquisition of language skills”(Reid & Trompf, 1991, p58). Middle ear perforation and discharge can occur very early in life (generally in the first year of life) and once older, discharge becomes chronic although intermittent. While perforations do heal, the hearing loss caused by them (and chronic ear discharge) occurs at a “critical time for learning and the development of language skills” (Reid & Trompf, 1991, p329). Unfortunately, there is little evidence that any medical treatment can alter the outcome of chronic ear discharge, and so the priority must now be to not only reduce the prevalence of the condition, but to put measures in place to help children suffering from these diseases as well as their families, to aid not only their language development at home, but their transition into a school environment, and to avoid issues such as bullying, literacy and attitudes towards schooling.

     

    With the growing awareness of literacy and language development issues among Indigenous children, there are a growing number of prevention strategies appearing. Some, like the bilingual education David Price referred to as unreliable, are hotly debated by teachers, and others are already in place in many schools. Reid & Trompf mention the development of improved hearing aid devices for use in schools, and improved teaching for teachers on the education of hearing impaired Indigenous children (1991, p329), and Burrow and Galloway give a detailed list of strategies to work with Indigenous children with hearing impairment, including the development and improvement of literacy and language skills. They give suggestions for classroom management such as seating arrangement, organisation of classrooms to minimise noise, installation of amplification devices, the negotiation with students of set “listening behaviours”, pre-teaching new material (key words etc), the establishment of predictable routines and of peer support or “buddy” systems. They also suggest that teachers take the time to identify the gaps in a child’s language development and help the student develop the understanding of language that is critical to success in written literacy, focusing on phonological awareness, text skills, linking sounds and written language and developing “world” knowledge (of concepts, context and content of language) (Burrow Galloway, Weisnoffer, 2009). Comics such as Streetwize’s 2006 “Cooee! Can ya hear me?” and factsheets such as the 2008 “Hearing in the classroom” produced by Australian Hearing also provide both teachers and students with strategies to maximise learning in the classroom and generate discussion about students’ needs and how these are met. The Cape York Institute suggests a number of strategies to improve language ant literacy skills in Indigenous schools including the linking of welfare payments to school attendance, improving the quality of teaching in remote communities (it’s estimated a third of teachers in Cape York have no previous experience – and even those with experience can be improved with professional development strategies such as the What Works. The Works Program [www.whatworks.edu.au]), and the improvement of literacy outcomes, advocating the use of Macquarie University’s remedial literacy program MULTILIT (Making Up Lost Time in Literacy), as well as early childhood interventions and ongoing interventions at a community and school level. Other programs and resources such as the National Accelerated Literacy Program (2007, formerly Scaffolding Literacy), Aboriginal voices: Activities and resources for English (produced by the Department of Education, Training and Employment, 2000) and Building bridges: Literacy development in young Indigenous Children ( produced by Fleer and Williams-Kennedy, 2002) have been produced to help teachers, students and families understand and work to solve literacy, language and communication issues in Indigenous education. MULTILIT, for example, has been accepted by the Cape York Institute as well as the Australian Government, which agreed to fund its introduction in the four schools located in the Welfare Reform trial communities, beginning in 2008, and has achieved much success with its students and is used internationally for students in special education, mainstream education and Indigenous education as well as at a community level.

     

    While these are all steps in the right direction, it is important to remember that there are many more Indigenous who are not given access to this kind of program and still struggle linguistically every day, whether through lack of exposure to Standard Australian English, starting and falling behind at school, because of an ear disease or hearing difficulties stunting language development, or simply through lack of attendance, and it is these students that we as educators, parents or policy makers need to reach in order to make a true difference to the wide gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. It is important that while considering the complicated and inter-connected issues of Indigenous education, that we remember that “while Indigenous students may present as a homogenous group they represent a wide variety of languages, beliefs and practices” (Dempsey & Arthur-Kelly, 2007). As earlier noted by Burrow and Galloway, teachers need to take the time to identify gaps in their students’ development and subsequently identify the right course of action for that individual. Perhaps a structured program such as MULTILIT is necessary, or perhaps it is a cooperative relationship and communication with a student’s parents (who must always be recognised as the first educators of a child). Whatever the solution may be, it must be recognised to exist. There are many resources available to teachers, school staff, parents, and students themselves, that if taken advantage of, could truly change the educational path of an Aboriginal child forever. Perhaps David Price puts it most succinctly when he says that “we want Aboriginal children to talk to the world, not just to whitefellas”.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Coooee! Can ya hear me?, (2006), Sydney, Streetwize Communications,

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Bibliography & Reference List:

     

    Aboriginal Literacy Strategy, Department of Education and Training,[retrieved 28.4.11] http://www.det.wa.edu.au/aboriginaleducation/detcms/navigation/teaching-and-learning/literacy-and-numeracy/aboriginal-literacy-strategy/?oid=MultiPartArticle-id-7169080

     

    Armstrong, J.E., Laing, D.G., Wilkes, F.J., (2008), Olfactory function in Australian Aboriginal children and chronic otitis media, Chemical Senses, vol 33, issue 6, pp503-507

     

    Arthur-Kelly, M., Dempsey, I., (2007), Maximising Learning Outcomes in Diverse Classrooms, Sydney, Thompson

     

    Ashman, A., Elkins, J., (2009), Education for Inclusion and Diversity, Sydney, Pearson Education Australia

     

    Background Briefing Podcast: Welcome to my world, (2011), ABC Radio National, [retrieved 1.5.11] http://www.abc.net.au/rn/backgroundbriefing/stories/2011/3201609.htm

     

    Burrow, S., Galloway, A., Weissofner. N., (2009) Review of educational and other approaches to hearing loss among Indigenous people, [retrieved20.4.11] http://www.healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au/other-health-conditions/ear/reviews/our-review-education

     

    Coates, H., Vijayasekaran, S., Mackendrick, A., Leidwinger, L., et al, (2008), Aboriginal Ear Health Manual, Perth, Alcon Laboratories Australia

     

    Cooee! Can ya hear me?, (2006), Sydney, Streetwize Communications

     

    Hearing in the Classroom, (2008), Sydney, Australian Hearing

     

    Literacy Discussion Paper, (2007),Cape York Institute, [retrieved 21.4.11] http://www.cyi.org.au/WEBSITE%20uploads/Education%20Attachments/Literacy%20Discussion%20Paper%20Final.pdf

     

    Marsh, C., (2010), Becoming a Teacher, Sydney, Pearson Education Australia

     

    MULTILIT, [retrieved 21.4.11] http://www.multilit.com/

     

    National statement of principles and standards for more culturally inclusive schooling in the 21st Century, (2000), Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA), [retrieved 22.4.11] http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/principl_file.pdf

     

    Reid, J., Trompf, P., (1991), The Health of Aboriginal Australia, Sydney, Harcourt Brace & Co

     

    Standard Australian English, (2010),Australian Style: a national bulletin on issues in Australian style and English in Australia, Vol 17, issue 1, [retrieved 23.4.11] http://www.ling.mq.edu.au/news/australian_style.htm

     

    What Works. The Works Program, (2010),Commonwealth Government, [retrieved 20.4.11] http://www.whatworks.edu.au/dbAction.do?cmd=homePage

    Education is not whitefella. It belongs to the world.”

    – David Price

     

    The issue of language in the education of Indigenous students is one with broad and far-reaching consequences, affecting a great proportion of students and families, and contributing to the yawning gaps in educational standards between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. Aboriginal educational issues are not often simple and isolated, but rather are complicated and interconnected, with issues such as language being linked to socio-economic, health, social and communication issues. These interconnected issues have a major impact on students’ attitudes to schooling, bullying, ‘drop-out’ rates, and literacy and numeracy skills. This essay will explore the issue of language in Aboriginal education, in particular where language and communication is affected by health and culture and how this impacts on the education of Indigenous students, as well as strategies to improve language related issues that may already be in place, and those which can be used in one’s own classroom.

     

    The issue of language in terms of Indigenous education is a complex and multi-faceted one, and defining it requires an understanding of the vast range of influencing issues, as well as an understanding of the many issues which are influenced in turn by it; language is only a small part of a larger whole in terms of Indigenous education. One of the aspects of the issue of language discussed in this essay is the teaching of Standard Australian English and the discussions around bilingual education in remote communities. While the National statement of principles and standards for more culturally inclusive schooling in the 21st Century states that “schooling acknowledges the capacity of all young Indigenous people to learn by… expecting all Indigenous children to be fluent in Standard Australian English and at the same time being inclusive of the student’s home language” (MCEECDYA, 2000), the issue of language and its use in the education of Indigenous children is still debated. Language is an issue inextricably linked with communication, especially verbal, and as such is also influenced heavily by culture and health. This essay will analyse the health issues that often cause problems with language and communication that significantly affect the educational experience and outcomes for Indigenous students, as well as the cultural circumstances around the debate about bilingual education.

     

    Speaking of mainstream education, Susan Butler, editor of the Macquarie Dictionary states that the use of Standard Australian English “comes back to the long-established and very worthy desire that teachers have to protect their students against solecism so that they pass the exam they want to pass, they get the job they want to have, they achieve the lifetime of honour and distinction which they want to achieve” (Australian Style, 2010). While these goals are universal, they are not reached by all students; with only 36% of Indigenous young people continuing their education to year 12, and less than 2% going on to undertake tertiary studies, far below the average for non-Indigenous students (Ashman & Elkins, 2009). The Cape York Institute’s discussion paper on Literacy Improvement (2007) states that “early access to a Standard Australian English environment will help to prepare Indigenous children to develop their literacy skills” – but in many communities (especially those in rural or remote areas), Indigenous children may not receive these kinds of foundations, arriving at school already disadvantaged in terms of literacy and language. Warlpiri woman Bess Nungarrayi Price, mother and advocate of Indigenous issues voices the views of many Indigenous parents when she discussing whether teaching predominately in English is more or less beneficial than teaching in local languages with English as a second language: “Why wouldn’t I want my children, my families, to be taught English first, because that’s a way in to the future… in order to get to know about the whole world you need that understanding of English to get you there, and that’s not happening with our children… The Northern Territory Government has made it their policy to teach English for four hours.. and I supported that and I agreed that that’s how schools should deliver English. You find that people around my age we all had that same kind of education and it was taught properly and that’s not what’s happening now and that’s why education is failing for our children. We want teachers to come out to our communities and teach English and not worry about trying to be blackfellas, not try to pretend to be someone that they aren’t, and that’s what’s happening, and to teach our children as if they are teaching white students.”(ABC Radio National, 2011) Her husband David Price, who has taught in both bilingual and English programmes, states that he has “never seen a bilingual programme done properly” either because teachers are poorly trained, because of the large number of languages still existing (“17”), or because no written resources in those languages exist, and suggests that if bilingual programmes are not totally successful, they should not be attempted at all.

     

    Ashman and Elkins cite another cause of low literacy achievement as being “a middle-ear infection such as otitis media or glue ear” (Ashman & Elkins, 2009, p114). Estimates of the prevalence of ear diseases amongst Indigenous children vary, Armstrong, Laing and Wilkes suggest the figure is 50% in some communities (Armstrong, Laing, Wilkes, 2008), while Reid and Trompf suggest the figure to be as high as 80% (much higher than for non-Indigenous children), often resulting in hearing loss “significant enough to interfere with education, particularly in the delayed acquisition of language skills”(Reid & Trompf, 1991, p58). Middle ear perforation and discharge can occur very early in life (generally in the first year of life) and once older, discharge becomes chronic although intermittent. While perforations do heal, the hearing loss caused by them (and chronic ear discharge) occurs at a “critical time for learning and the development of language skills” (Reid & Trompf, 1991, p329). Unfortunately, there is little evidence that any medical treatment can alter the outcome of chronic ear discharge, and so the priority must now be to not only reduce the prevalence of the condition, but to put measures in place to help children suffering from these diseases as well as their families, to aid not only their language development at home, but their transition into a school environment, and to avoid issues such as bullying, literacy and attitudes towards schooling.

     

    With the growing awareness of literacy and language development issues among Indigenous children, there are a growing number of prevention strategies appearing. Some, like the bilingual education David Price referred to as unreliable, are hotly debated by teachers, and others are already in place in many schools. Reid & Trompf mention the development of improved hearing aid devices for use in schools, and improved teaching for teachers on the education of hearing impaired Indigenous children (1991, p329), and Burrow and Galloway give a detailed list of strategies to work with Indigenous children with hearing impairment, including the development and improvement of literacy and language skills. They give suggestions for classroom management such as seating arrangement, organisation of classrooms to minimise noise, installation of amplification devices, the negotiation with students of set “listening behaviours”, pre-teaching new material (key words etc), the establishment of predictable routines and of peer support or “buddy” systems. They also suggest that teachers take the time to identify the gaps in a child’s language development and help the student develop the understanding of language that is critical to success in written literacy, focusing on phonological awareness, text skills, linking sounds and written language and developing “world” knowledge (of concepts, context and content of language) (Burrow Galloway, Weisnoffer, 2009). Comics such as Streetwize’s 2006 “Cooee! Can ya hear me?” and factsheets such as the 2008 “Hearing in the classroom” produced by Australian Hearing also provide both teachers and students with strategies to maximise learning in the classroom and generate discussion about students’ needs and how these are met. The Cape York Institute suggests a number of strategies to improve language ant literacy skills in Indigenous schools including the linking of welfare payments to school attendance, improving the quality of teaching in remote communities (it’s estimated a third of teachers in Cape York have no previous experience – and even those with experience can be improved with professional development strategies such as the What Works. The Works Program [www.whatworks.edu.au]), and the improvement of literacy outcomes, advocating the use of Macquarie University’s remedial literacy program MULTILIT (Making Up Lost Time in Literacy), as well as early childhood interventions and ongoing interventions at a community and school level. Other programs and resources such as the National Accelerated Literacy Program (2007, formerly Scaffolding Literacy), Aboriginal voices: Activities and resources for English (produced by the Department of Education, Training and Employment, 2000) and Building bridges: Literacy development in young Indigenous Children ( produced by Fleer and Williams-Kennedy, 2002) have been produced to help teachers, students and families understand and work to solve literacy, language and communication issues in Indigenous education. MULTILIT, for example, has been accepted by the Cape York Institute as well as the Australian Government, which agreed to fund its introduction in the four schools located in the Welfare Reform trial communities, beginning in 2008, and has achieved much success with its students and is used internationally for students in special education, mainstream education and Indigenous education as well as at a community level.

     

    While these are all steps in the right direction, it is important to remember that there are many more Indigenous who are not given access to this kind of program and still struggle linguistically every day, whether through lack of exposure to Standard Australian English, starting and falling behind at school, because of an ear disease or hearing difficulties stunting language development, or simply through lack of attendance, and it is these students that we as educators, parents or policy makers need to reach in order to make a true difference to the wide gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. It is important that while considering the complicated and inter-connected issues of Indigenous education, that we remember that “while Indigenous students may present as a homogenous group they represent a wide variety of languages, beliefs and practices” (Dempsey & Arthur-Kelly, 2007). As earlier noted by Burrow and Galloway, teachers need to take the time to identify gaps in their students’ development and subsequently identify the right course of action for that individual. Perhaps a structured program such as MULTILIT is necessary, or perhaps it is a cooperative relationship and communication with a student’s parents (who must always be recognised as the first educators of a child). Whatever the solution may be, it must be recognised to exist. There are many resources available to teachers, school staff, parents, and students themselves, that if taken advantage of, could truly change the educational path of an Aboriginal child forever. Perhaps David Price puts it most succinctly when he says that “we want Aboriginal children to talk to the world, not just to whitefellas”.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Coooee! Can ya hear me?, (2006), Sydney, Streetwize Communications,

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Bibliography & Reference List:

     

    Aboriginal Literacy Strategy, Department of Education and Training,[retrieved 28.4.11] http://www.det.wa.edu.au/aboriginaleducation/detcms/navigation/teaching-and-learning/literacy-and-numeracy/aboriginal-literacy-strategy/?oid=MultiPartArticle-id-7169080

     

    Armstrong, J.E., Laing, D.G., Wilkes, F.J., (2008), Olfactory function in Australian Aboriginal children and chronic otitis media, Chemical Senses, vol 33, issue 6, pp503-507

     

    Arthur-Kelly, M., Dempsey, I., (2007), Maximising Learning Outcomes in Diverse Classrooms, Sydney, Thompson

     

    Ashman, A., Elkins, J., (2009), Education for Inclusion and Diversity, Sydney, Pearson Education Australia

     

    Background Briefing Podcast: Welcome to my world, (2011), ABC Radio National, [retrieved 1.5.11] http://www.abc.net.au/rn/backgroundbriefing/stories/2011/3201609.htm

     

    Burrow, S., Galloway, A., Weissofner. N., (2009) Review of educational and other approaches to hearing loss among Indigenous people, [retrieved20.4.11] http://www.healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au/other-health-conditions/ear/reviews/our-review-education

     

    Coates, H., Vijayasekaran, S., Mackendrick, A., Leidwinger, L., et al, (2008), Aboriginal Ear Health Manual, Perth, Alcon Laboratories Australia

     

    Cooee! Can ya hear me?, (2006), Sydney, Streetwize Communications

     

    Hearing in the Classroom, (2008), Sydney, Australian Hearing

     

    Literacy Discussion Paper, (2007),Cape York Institute, [retrieved 21.4.11] http://www.cyi.org.au/WEBSITE%20uploads/Education%20Attachments/Literacy%20Discussion%20Paper%20Final.pdf

     

    Marsh, C., (2010), Becoming a Teacher, Sydney, Pearson Education Australia

     

    MULTILIT, [retrieved 21.4.11] http://www.multilit.com/

     

    National statement of principles and standards for more culturally inclusive schooling in the 21st Century, (2000), Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA), [retrieved 22.4.11] http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/principl_file.pdf

     

    Reid, J., Trompf, P., (1991), The Health of Aboriginal Australia, Sydney, Harcourt Brace & Co

     

    Standard Australian English, (2010),Australian Style: a national bulletin on issues in Australian style and English in Australia, Vol 17, issue 1, [retrieved 23.4.11] http://www.ling.mq.edu.au/news/australian_style.htm

     

    What Works. The Works Program, (2010),Commonwealth Government, [retrieved 20.4.11] http://www.whatworks.edu.au/dbAction.do?cmd=homePage


  4. Porn Shirts

    August 10, 2011 by sylvia

    Please click on this post title to comment or “like”.

     

    This post is in relation to some issues brought up by a big facebook argument regarding pornographic t-shirts. See the original group Say No to Porn T-Shirts.

     

    This page was created on facebook a while ago by concerned people (many of them parents) in response to t-shirts like this:

     

    Recently the group has been attacked by people insisting that people have the right to wear whatever they like, and the page has erupted into an explosion of name-calling and arguments. I found that on some points, I didn’t completely agree with either side, and so posted this:

    I am a sex-positive feminist and am really interested in gender stereotypes, gender roles and how those are reflected in images of women (and men), pop culture and the media.
    I’m also an artist who regularly includes nudes in my work and has no problem with nudity and sexuality and often produce work around the themes of gender and sexuality. 

    While I don’t like or use porn myself (for a number of reasons), I am not one to make calls for it to be banned. I have no problem with consenting adults using pornographic material, and I always worry when the ‘nanny state’ issue comes up, as I like there to be a limit to the control the government has over its citizens.
    I am worried, however, by the fragile and tenuous line between public and private imagery of gender stereotypes.

    I love seeing intelligent debate around the issues of sexualised imagery of both men and women, and I love that because of this, I’m given the opportunity to constantly re-assess my values and my opinions about such an important topic. I even find that I have a different set of priorities than other members of this page (unavoidable as I am not myself a parent).
    The reason I joined this page is because I have a problem with how this very structured, very stereotypical and very hypersexual imagery is finding its way into the public sphere. It concerns me that these shirts project ONE very rigid and structured kind of sexuality which excludes a lot of people, whether they be men, women or neither.
    I feel it’s a shame that society has embraced this as the only ‘acceptable’ kind of sexuality, especially as we see growing acceptance of people of diverse genders and sexualities. 

    I feel that perhaps we have been so desensitised that we now fail to identify sexism in our everyday lives, and can not see how pornographic material affects and reflects our lives outside of the bedroom, and indeed, our own identities.

    I still remember being 6 years old and seeing a rack of pornographic magazines behind the counter of my local newsagent. My eyes just about popped out of my head and my mind was filled with questions and curiosity. Was this what all grown-ups did? Was I supposed to do this one day? Were these women beautiful?

    For me, it’s not the boobies, it’s not the sexuality.. it’s not these things that threaten me, what worries me is how many people unwittingly prescribe to such a narrow and constricting definition of sexuality and gender roles, and by wearing these t-shirts, project them into the community, further influencing our society’s unwitting sexism and stereotypes.

    I think one of the best things I’ve done is accept “not being sure” about how I feel about things. I feel so much more free knowing that my opinion is malleable and I can shape it how I choose – if I read a book with a fantastic point, I can incorporate it into my values, or if I see something that confuses me, I can challenge my own views knowing that I can justify both sides of a particular argument in different ways.
    For example, my love of burlesque and retro pin-ups is always being challenged by my contempt for rigid sexual imagery and constricting gender roles. Each day I think about how my opinions are formed – is it the retro kitsch that appeals to me? The fact that much neo-burlesque accepts people of all walks of life, sexuality, gender, body shape, cultural background etc? I DUNNO! It’s fun justifying it to myself though – all I know is that I enjoy it and I am aware that it’s helping build who I am and how I feel.

    So I will watch this debate as it unfolds, and I may participate every now and then, yet I feel I come from a unique perspective in that I’ve got nothing to lose, I can learn from either side, and incorporate many points into an argument I feel best represents my own feelings and values.

     


  5. Review: Dylan Moran

    July 29, 2011 by sylvia

    I recently won tickets to Dylan Moran’s Yeah Yeah tour through ABC Arts, along with a “best of” Dylan Moran DVD. Part of the competition was that I had to write a review of the show for their website, and I thought I’d post a link here.

    (Despite what they say, it was not Rachel Fountain’s review that sparked my own, it was fear that the ABC would break my legs if I renegged on my promise.)

    We came, we laughed for two hours, we queued for the parking ticket pay machine, we left.
    Another year, another excellent tour from Irish comic Dylan Moran.
    Moran returned to Perth for his Yeah Yeah tour, performing at the Perth Convention Centre’s Riverside Theatre.
    The venue itself topped last year’s tour, or perhaps it was because instead of sitting in the Burswood Theatre troposphere as I did last time, I was in the seventh row and could actually see the stage without being distracted by altitude sickness, but a friend in row Z assured me that the view in this venue was just as great as the show.
    Dylan Moran is well known for his work on film and television, but seeing him live is a whole different experience.
    Each performance is different from the next, shaped and influenced by different responses to audience interactions and random tangents and improvisation, with one particular joke transforming into a harrowing and inspiring recount of the life of Batman.
    Each night is different from the next, and each city’s shows vary from each other – it’s always fun to buy the DVD of a show once it comes out and see how it compares to the live show you attended.
    Each show is researched a bit beforehand and often jokes are related to the local area. As a “reviewer” I feel a bit under pressure to come up with a criticism and perhaps this is it, that the references to Armadale, Dalkeith, Kalgoorlie and Rottnest Island were a tad clumsy and felt a bit “googled”, yet added a depth of connection with the audience that other foreign comics often lack.
    There doesn’t often seem to be a strong overarching theme to Moran’s shows, but his jokes are linked through his iconic cynicism and use of language – silly off-the-cuff remarks prove hilarious and memorable thanks to his fantastic stage presence and sharp vocabulary. Perhaps it’s this that makes his performances so enjoyable for people of varying backgrounds, even specific topics such as relationships, old age, installation art and heavy metal were enjoyed equally by young and old alike.
    Overall, Yeah Yeah is a great tour from a leading comedian, sure to please an audience from a wide variety of backgrounds and with many interests. I’m hard pressed to find a criticism of such an excellent show and can highly recommend watching Dylan Moran either live or on DVD, whether you’re familiar with his other work or not. An excellent show from a talented comic who consistently delivers performances of an excellent quality, sure to leave you gasping for breath!

     

    More audience reviews at http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2011/07/29/3281426.htm


  6. Review: Women in the Media

    June 21, 2011 by sylvia

    Recently a friend and I attended a panel discussion of the topic “Portrayal of Women in the Media” run by the Government’s Women’s Advisory Council. The organisers were keen for feedback.. so … here we go….

    The session began with an introduction of the panel members, most of whom were media figures like newsreaders, those working in advertising, a comedian, and one lecturer of Women’s Studies. Then began a general discussion touching on a few general issues about how women are represented in the media. I think this is where the evening descended into a bit of a superficial and poorly organized event. I don’t intend to sound harsh when I say this, but the evening  missed the point a bit, and could have really discussed issues with more depth if there was more time.

    Conversation was limited due to time constraints, and as such, I think it missed a few truly important issues. The facilitator of the discussion indicated that we were not to discuss issues revolving around social media.. which really limited the more pressing contemporary issues  – ones that really need to be discussed, as their constant evolution presents us with difficult challenges which have far-reaching effects on young women today.

    The opinions of panel members tended to be homogenous, focused extensively on the ‘media’ aspect of the Portrayal of Women in the Media (understandable, considering as how many had areas of knowledge firmly based around their own experiences of working in the media, rather than about feminism and women’s issues). Not only was the panel discussion lacking in depth, but also lacked an in-depth discussion of feminism and the many issues affecting women not just working in the media, but being exposed to media.

    There were a number of things that really annoyed me about this evening.

    First was the gender stereotyped jokes. These in themselves were not “offensive” as such, but nor were they appropriate. There were a few men in the audience, and one on the panel, and every time one of the men spoke, their comment would often be preceded by some comment along the lines of “don’t stone me, but..” and rounds of applause before they spoke.. applause, for having a wang? Don’t ask me. Either way, I didn’t find myself laughing at any of these jokes, mainly because I had come to this session expecting a serious and enlightening discussion of the exact issues that were being made light of through these lame-o jokes about men never doing housework.

    Secondly was the ignorance of how gender stereotypes affect both men and women. Yes we were there to discuss ‘women’s issues’, but more and more, these issues are being recognized as wider ‘gender issues’, which I feel is a far more succinct way of describing the nature of the problems we face. Every now and then the male panel member would make comments about either how something would change if the roles were changed (blatantly demonstrating a misunderstanding of the concept that power can not just be switched instantly in a situation where one group has had power over another for centuries), or about how a certain issue affects men as well (i.e. soap commercials where the women are long-suffering housewives cleaning up after their bumbling idiot husbands). YES these ads affect both men and women, but we knew that already. As feminists are concerned with “gender stereotypes” and “gender roles” that society enforces in a vicious cycle-type hegemony that so many of us unwittingly subscribe to, then it goes without saying that having strict masculine and feminine roles harms everyone, no matter their anatomy.

     

    These sorts of points could have been discussed had there been deeper audience input, and a longer session time, but because of time restrictions (and to some extent, the experience of the panel members) they were generally ignored or discussed in very shallow detail, frustrating myself as an audience member as I wished to point out how they’d missed the flip side of the coin on certain issues, but I was bound only to question, not to make comments or statements.

    I was, as an audience member, also instructed to exclude discussions of Social Media in my potential questions. While I understand that this may have been in an effort to keep the discussion focused, and partially due to time constraints, I feel that the conversation suffered as a result. Questions relating to how feminists, lesbians, and “others” (butch women, those that don’t ‘fit in’) are treated or depicted in the media lacked depth because the experiences of so many panel members just revolved around news reporting or advertising (points were made by members about one lesbian local newsreader, and about how advertising is just shallow and aimed at target markets, so often excludes the “other”). This left out the big issues facing these kinds of women in terms of how they are treated through social media, print (magazines as well as newspapers) and pop culture in general. I spoke to one panel member Deborah Kennedy afterwards, and she was shocked to hear of all the offensive and misogynist pages on Facebook that are steadily gaining popularity, forums for truly offensive and derogatory comments, most of which revolve around kitchens and sandwiches. If any woman (or man, or neither) is to attempt to defend the 50% of the population who is being discriminated against, they are showered in comments about their faggotry, their lack of kitchen environment, and how much they need a cock in them (corrective rape, anyone?). Surely not all of the “likers” of these pages truly feel this way, some may really be joking, but is it not disturbing that these kinds of jokes are so commonly accepted (if they were racist or discriminated against the disabled, surely there would less followers, right?).  While it may be a big jump from abusing people online to something like corrective rape, the funny thing is that the kinds of comments being made online actually reflect what is being depicted in mainstream media (women’s roles as nurturers, cleaners, mothers, lovers being shoved down our throats by every ad for detergent or snack food). If all the women on TV ads are in the kitchen looking after their families, it’s not such a big jump to tell a woman to shut up and get back in the kitchen when you’re safe and anonymous.

    Another issue that got to me, no matter how small, was the attitude expressed by many towards certain kinds of media. Yes the panel members were highly respected within their respective professions, but the contempt shown for some others (often by the audience) was slightly maddening. When references were made to women’s magazines and breakfast television shows, people rolled eyes, groaned and laughed at those who “admitted” to reading/watching them. I read Ellie Levenson’s The Noughtie Girl’s Guide to Feminism when I was just starting to think about gender issues, and one of the most basic points she makes is about how we treat Chick Lit. Of course, to assume (read: enforce) what “women’s interests” actually are, is inherently sexist, and yes, my blood does boil a little every time I walk past the Women’s Interest section of any newsagent, and yet our open contempt towards these sorts of media is problematic in itself. While we may look down our noses at the women who buy and read gossip magazines, we are ourselves buying into a culture of the anti-feminine. By deriding feminine things like chick-lit, chick flicks, gossip rags and romance novels, we are jumping on the feminine-things-are-silly-and-brainless bandwagon.

    So when a panelist mentioned an issue revolving around a breakfast television program and asked if anyone else had seen it, I proudly put my hand up, and sneered while the audience made disapproving noises and panelists made jokes about those of us willing to “admit” our shameful secret of knowing who Mel and Kochie are. “Bullshit”, I said out loud, I bet they’d all watched it too, but were too proud to admit to doing such a shamefully “feminine” thing.

    Next in the list of things that made me grumpy that night was the word “choice”. I have begun to hate the word; choice has become both our best friend and our worst enemy. Yes, women have the choice to have abortions, grow their hair, have sex as much as they want, and dress how they like, and thank god for that!! But the amount of times I’ve heard people excuse certain acts or behavior because it’s someone’s “choice” is driving me mad. Natasha Walter’s Living Dolls makes reference to the effect of pornography on individuals and society, and often discusses how seemingly inexcusable behavior is written off as being the result of a particularly ‘empowered’ woman’s choice. Yes women may choose to participate in amateur pornography, but true empowerment stems from education and information. While I cannot support an anti-pornography feminist view, I believe that there is something very unhealthy about the current state of parts of the adult industry at the moment. Amateur “modeling” nights at pubs and nightclubs where drunk women are leered at and not actually paid a cent (for work which other “amateurs” make comfortable livings from) are the sort of event excused by “choice”. When Walters interviewed those running these kinds of events and probed them about how they’d feel if their daughters participated in this kind of industry or event, they often used the word choice again, but in a different way, with the word “informed” in front of it. The sentiment was often, yes I would support her if she made this choice, but I would make sure that her choice was truly informed and that she knew she had other options and other paths to take. How is a girl supposed to make an informed decision when all that she knows is what she’s been told by mass media, who are only out to target an audience they have themselves created?

    There seemed to be a contempt among the panel for women who had “made the choice” to dress or act a certain way, as if they were ‘letting the team down’ or something.. and this I found a bit distressing. Not only did it indicate a thoroughly negative view of sex and the expression of sexuality, but it also put the responsibility for raunch culture squarely on the shoulders of the women who participate in it, rather than accepting any responsibility for it themselves (seeing as how many of the members worked in industries which heavily influence the gender roles and stereotypes of our society).

    One more point mentioned during the panel discussion was women bitching about other women. This maddening discussion about how women should just be nice to each other, and be like the men, who didn’t ever bitch about colleagues like women do, continued up until the Womens’ Studies lecturer mentioned how this may well have just become commonplace through the long enforced necessity for women to compete with each other for men. This was an interesting point, but not much was made of it and the conversation continued on a different tangent.

    During the discussion of this subject, however, the conversation was coming dangerously close to the mention of the concept of ‘sisterhood’. The idea that women should stop being mean to each other is nice, but shouldn’t everyone stop being mean to everyone, no matter what gonads they possess? While supporting each other is an admirable concept, it can quickly turn into a sexist one, too. Be nice and support other women just because they are women? Hold on.. what if I hate a woman? What if she’s slept with my husband, or burned down my house, or if she deliberately ran over my dog? What if she’s just a bitch? I should be completely entitled to hate whoever I want no matter what they look like, thank you very much.

     

    If women ruled the world.. there'd be no war.. only YOGA

    This leads me neatly to another lesson that I learned from Ellie Levenson’s book and that is to be inherently suspicious of any sentence that begins with “If women ruled the world…”. If women ruled the world what, we’d all sit around a scented candle holding hands and doing macramé? No. To assume difference is to enforce difference. Saying men are aggressive and women are loving is saying that men are hunters and women are nurturers, which is saying that men are workers and women are housewives, which is saying that men should watch TV and go one Facebook and tell women to get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich.

     

    So if anyone couldn’t be bothered reading that (I’m sure you could be forgiven for that..) here’s a summary:

    While I’m glad that these sorts of events are being put together, I feel that this one did not fulfill its potential… basically, for a night that was meant to be a serious discussion about women’s issues, I felt that it turned out to be a somewhat simplistic and superficial conversation that left me feeling a bit unsatisfied.

     


  7. Fatshion

    May 21, 2011 by sylvia

    Funnily enough, a lady in a cafe toilet and an episode of The Real Wives of Miami managed to prompt me to think about something. (!)

    While washing my hands in the bathroom of  a painfully hip cafe, a lady complimented my black and white retro A-line halter polka dot dress. Then she complimented my black blazer with white trimming asking if they came together. I told her no, I put the outfit together myself. Then she told me my mother must be proud of me. I didn’t quite know what to say to that so I left.
    Once we left the cafe my friends and I watched some trash on their Foxtel, and I began to think (ironically). The women on the show were fitter than I ever hope to be, with unnaturally long legs and all the rest, all going to fashion shows and prancing around talking about designers and clothes and boys, you know, like all 40 year olds do.

     

    I found it ironic that they were talking about their ready-t0-wear minidresses as if they were high fashion, or somehow special or skilled for looking good in them.
    It made me think of the toilet lady (that’s officially her name now) and how impressed she was my ability to choose two pieces of clothing that looked good together and were forgiving on my figure. (Note, I’m prescribing to traditional standards of beauty here and making broad generalisations).

    These housewives waltz around stores plucking whatever they like off the shelves, knowing that no matter what it is, chances are it will look perfect on them. And why shouldn’t it? After all, the clothes were designed for that kind of body, right?
    Then I thought of me… Scurrying around department stores taking whatever I can get, scouring ebay for the clothes I want, because regular stores stock clothing designed for women of a different shape.

    Now don’t think I’m getting dramatic here, as a size 16, I don’t consider myself huge (although I could probably break one of those housewives in half if I didn’t see her sitting on my seat, but then again, I think most people could…) but I am larger than the standard sample size, and we all know that department store pieces, while available in larger sizes, are simply just bigger versions of the smaller sample size. That’s fine if your shape is just a larger version of a stick, but if your actual body is of different proportions, you’ve got no hope (how many times have I had to choose between fitting my boobs in, or fitting the rest of me into a dress).

    So in my petulant-child kind of way, I decided that (in certain cases of course) it actually takes more skill and fashion know-how to dress well as a fat lady, than as a thin/sample size lady. I work hard to choose the clothes that I know will suit my body shape – and they are not always easy to find. I am a huge fan of retro styles, petticoats and A-line skirts, and when those are not in fashion, the only way is ebay.
    Sure it’s easier to walk into a department store, try something on, look fantastic and buy it, but it takes a thorough understanding of your body and of fashion, to do the same as a fat woman.

    My dress, from Atomic Cherry on ebay,

    Don’t think I’m ripping on the thin ladies here (I am the last person to do that, as the creator of this facebook page I am against size discrimination in all its forms), because there are a lot of fat ladies who get it very very wrong – and why not, when all maisntream fashion presents you with is a bigger version of a dress designed for a woman who isn’t shaped like you – but I’d like to think that the fact that I, as a fat girl, can go out and dress well, shows that I have a strong understanding of fashion and what works, something that thinner women often don’t necessarily need, as everything is already catered to them (to a certain extent).

    Image from StyleCEO

    And I think this understanding is evidence of my “growing up” in terms of size acceptance and fashion. I have come to accept that some things I should just not wear. I mean, as a feminist, of course I believe I can wear whatever I feel like and fuck what everyone else thinks, but for me personally, there are some things that I feel that do not suit me, and that I don’t think I can pull off, and probably never will. Even if I lose weight (which is happening slowly slowly) I just do not have the Twiggy shape necessary to look amazing in 1960s-style gogo dresses. While I lament this, I CAN DEAL WITH IT. I can appreciate them without wearing them.

    The Powder Room's "Hully Gully" @ www.enterthepowderroom.com

    But this is ok, I am a plus-sized woman who has a good enough understanding of my body and of fashion to look good anyway. So until fashion houses begin acknowledging my existence (which probably won’t happen, and I understand this, fashion is about fantasy, the ideal, blah blah, shut up Lagerfeld..), it will take me a little bit longer and I’ll work a little bit harder, but when I go out I am comfortable with who I am, without having to  cram myself into an outfit not made for me.

    Cupcake’s Clothes

     

     

    Some inspiration?

    Cupcake’s Clothes

    The Powder Room

    Atomic Cherry on eBay (AU)

    All women are “real” whether skinny or fat

    “As fat as I wanna be” @ Sexandthefatgirl.com


  8. A welcome, and an old post.

    May 20, 2011 by sylvia

    Welcome to the revamped Base of the World (so named for one of my favourite Piero Manzoni pieces). Things have been improved to enhance viewing and browsing, and hopefully you’ll enjoy the posts on art, feminism, education, fat, fashion, music, and whatever else takes my fancy.

    For old times’ sake, here’s a post from the old blog, also featured at www.thedollrag.com.  I may one day (if I get the time/motivation) choose to have another look through it and produce an edited version. Until then, feel free to (respectfully) comment or discuss if you feel the urge.

    The Problem with Unilever

    I think we’ve all seen the Dove Campaign for Real Beauty or the Dove Self Esteem Fund. This seems like an honourable cause, and for a while I was pleased to see a change in attitude being led by a big company! Finally! 

    Then I learned more about Dove, their campaign, and their parent company, and now I find myself boycotting Dove (among other products), and listing for you some of the many reasons why.

    First I’d like to acknowledge a few things that may occur to readers.

    1)Dove is a company, (owned in turn by a larger company called Unilever) as such, its sole practical purpose is to make money through the mass production and marketing of a product. However when a company chooses to market itself in a morally self-righteous way that, like the Campaign for Real Beauty, criticises its own industry and attempts to change society’s values and attitudes , they become responsible for the contents of their advertising and their cause. Suddenly it’s not just an ad any more, it’s a moral instruction, trying to help a cause and change the way we think. This leaves it open to analysis, criticism and pressure to “do it right” more than an ad that just says “buy my deodorant”.

    2)I understand that to boycott Lipton Tea because it’s owned by the same company as Dove is a bit indirect but I consider it to be like vegetarianism. Other people can buy Unilever products, I’m fine with that, if I can get someone to think about this issue in a way they haven’t before, then I’ll be really happy, let alone if someone decides to stop supporting Unilever. It’s a personal choice I have decided to make because I’m not comfortable with giving this company my money – not because I think that if I stop buying Rexona deodorant the whole company’s going to go broke.

    3)There are other issues with Unilever, some I may go into briefly, but many are not relevant to my argument. There are issues with outsourcing labour, animal testing, and products marketed in countries such as India and Malaysia which are considered racist (search Fair & Lovely on youtube, you will be amazed). I will be focusing on issues relating to Unilever’s hypocritical sexism, as well as a handful of issues I have with the advertising campaigns for both Dove and Lynx (both Unilever products).

    I’ll start with Dove. Their aim (apart from selling their product) is to “make women feel beautiful every day by widening the definition of beauty and inspiring them to take great care of themselves”. Ok, sounds good (maybe apart from the “inspiring them to take great care of themselves” part which to me sounds like “wash with dove soap”) but why don’t we take a closer look. Dove aims to “widen the definition of beauty” – so rather than “beautiful” meaning a tall, blonde, thin model with big boobs, Dove encourage us to consider other women as being beautiful too – they use images of larger women, older women, freckly women, darker women, etc in their advertisements. This is in itself an admirable task, but is it really feminist?
    Dove still places value on beauty – being beautiful is the aim of this campaign, even if beauty has been redefined, it is still something we are expected to strive towards. In an effort to tackle the self-esteem issues of teenage girls, Dove suggests we “Tell her she’s beautiful”. Why not “tell her she’s intelligent”, “tell her she’s kind”, “tell her she’s valuable”, “tell her she’s loved”. Granted, Dove is only a beauty company, but as mentioned before, by tackling this issue of female self-esteem, they must either do it right or not do it at all. If beauty is the only thing we have to strive for, where does this leave women who don’t fit in to Dove’s expanded definition of beauty? There are no images of morbidly obese women in Dove campaigns, no burns victims, no amputees, no albinos, no dwarves… yes I’m taking it a bit far here, but only in an effort to demonstrate that Dove’s broadened definition of beauty can serve to further marginalise those who don’t fit in to it. Not only has patriarchal society deemed them ugly, but even Dove has conveniently ignored them. The message that Dove fails to send to women is that beauty isn’t everything, and there is no reason why women can’t be valuable, visible members of society if they’re ugly. Not everyone’s beautiful, but everyone’s valuable.

    Even if you don’t agree with these points, there is one thing you may agree with me on, once you have read on. The Dove Campaign for Real Beauty is completely null and void, absolutely hypocritical and ineffective when we take into account the fact that its fellow Unilever company Lynx (or Axe in the US) circulates (clever) advertising like this:

    - A campaign where censored images of lingerie models are printed, the missing pieces only available to those who text a number after 9pm and receive and MMS with the missing bits. Also billboards which light up at night to reveal the models’ bodies: http://www.barryhand.ie/blog/axe-day-night-sms-engagement/

    - A casting competition for Australia’s hottest groupies to use in the next Lynx campaign: http://lynxeffect.com.au/casting/

    - A cheeky and creative game, the aim of which is to get with a hot lingerie model (she gets bored so easily that the player has to keep “twisting” or changing his personality, occupation, interests etc to keep her interested and eventually “get with” her [use your imagination]) This in itself is sending a questionable message to teenage boys: Hot girls are lingerie models. Girls won’t like you for who you are, keep them interested by changing your personality. Hmm…: http://lynxeffect.com.au/keepingkeeley/

    May I be the first to say – sorry what are we buying here? Are we buying deodorant or porn? Shower gel or prostitutes? I am mighty confused.
    What confuses me even more than how and why these images are even allowed into the mass media. No matter how clever or funny they may be, they not only objectify women (we can’t really argue this because it’s what they are intended to do) but they NORMALISE the objectification of women – so because these images surround us in all types of media and in many forms, we accept them as being normal representations of women – physically, sexually and behaviourally. This is not ok. I don’t want to one day raise a son who is conditioned by this advertising to think that success is not one but two groupies in bikinis spraying him with deodorant, body spray and shower gel (advertised as a “threesome”) and I do not want to raise a daughter who thinks that her body is her passport to success, love and value.

    There are a number of things wrong with Lynx’s advertising campaigns. Sexism is just one of them. These ads serve to destroy the self esteem of both boys and girls – so how can both Dove and Lynx be owned by the same company? Their aims seem to be majorly conflicting – while Dove apparently pours money into helping all girls think they’re beautiful no matter what, Lynx appears to be helping them think that boys are only interested in girls who emulate the Page 3 girls and soft porn models featured in their successful campaigns.


    I would probably not boycott Unilever if Lynx advertisements were not so outrageously pornographic. I probably wouldn’t bother to stop buying my Lipton Chai Lattes if Dove’s campaigns were not so disgustingly self-righteous. Both of these companies produce products which often have nothing to do with the images they circulate. It is the unbelievably extreme contrast between these two brands that has shocked me into my refusal to give them any more of my money. Once my last can of impulse is gone, that’s it for Unilever – no more Dove, Impulse or Chicken Tonight.
    I’m not trying to convince you to boycott them too, (though it’d be fab if you would! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=113130068040&ref=mf ) perhaps you’d rather just roll your eyes every time you see a Dove ad, or complain when you see a “Lynx Mynx” at your local Westfield shopping centre (her task is to date as many men as possible and pick the best one), either way, I’m thankful I’ve been lucky enough to have the opportunity to share with you something you may not have known about before.

    For those of you who wish to boycott Unilever, here is a list of Australian and New Zealand Unilever products.

    Bertolli,

    Bushells,

    Chicken Tonight (I just saw an ad for it on TV with a Unilever Logo)

    Choysa,

    Continental,

    Domestos,

    Dove,

    Drive,

    Flora,

    Food Solutions,

    Fruitrience,

    Impulse,

    Jiff,

    Lanchoo,

    Lipton,

    Lux,

    Lynx,

    Omo,

    Pears,

    Persil,

    Raguletto,

    Rexona,

    Streets,

    Sunsilk,

    Surf,

    Vaseline.

    Welcome to the new and improved Base of the World (so named after one of my favourite art pieces by Piero Manzoni).
    Some changes have been made so that browsing will be easier, and posting will hopefully become more regular on a bunch of topics, such as fashion, art, feminism, education, fat, music, and whatever else takes my fancy.